<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What could possibly go wrong?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.squirrelsgolikethis.com/2008/06/29/what-could-possibly-go-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.squirrelsgolikethis.com/2008/06/29/what-could-possibly-go-wrong/</link>
	<description>(a blog that has nothing to do with squirrels)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 04:23:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: boombadeus</title>
		<link>http://www.squirrelsgolikethis.com/2008/06/29/what-could-possibly-go-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>boombadeus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squirrelsgolikethis.com/2008/06/29/what-could-possibly-go-wrong/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Yeah. On this camera, I can&#039;t tell with the noise between 1/25 and 1/50.

I&#039;ve also tried seeing if I can tell visually, watching the shutter open from the back (when no film is loaded of course). Now that I think about it, this was dumb of me. Consider that TV is shot at 30 fps because that&#039;s the slowest speed that humans won&#039;t see flicker... what makes me think I could see the difference between 1/50 and 1/100? I guess I just wasn&#039;t thinking...

Anyway, I&#039;ve got a new roll loaded. I&#039;ll shoot all of these at the 1/100 setting and hope it comes out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah. On this camera, I can&#8217;t tell with the noise between 1/25 and 1/50.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also tried seeing if I can tell visually, watching the shutter open from the back (when no film is loaded of course). Now that I think about it, this was dumb of me. Consider that TV is shot at 30 fps because that&#8217;s the slowest speed that humans won&#8217;t see flicker&#8230; what makes me think I could see the difference between 1/50 and 1/100? I guess I just wasn&#8217;t thinking&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;ve got a new roll loaded. I&#8217;ll shoot all of these at the 1/100 setting and hope it comes out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: albert</title>
		<link>http://www.squirrelsgolikethis.com/2008/06/29/what-could-possibly-go-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>albert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 07:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squirrelsgolikethis.com/2008/06/29/what-could-possibly-go-wrong/#comment-82</guid>
		<description>i can hear a difference around 1/30s and slower. 1/125s just sounds like a continuous click to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i can hear a difference around 1/30s and slower. 1/125s just sounds like a continuous click to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

